Indian Journal of Sleep Medicine

Register      Login

VOLUME 20 , ISSUE 1 ( January-March, 2025 ) > List of Articles

VIEWPOINT

Nasal Expiratory Positive Airway Pressure Devices for Sleep Apnea

Nimit V. Khara, Sateesh Patel

Keywords : Nasal expiratory positive airway pressure, Novel therapy, Sleep apnea

Citation Information : Khara NV, Patel S. Nasal Expiratory Positive Airway Pressure Devices for Sleep Apnea. Indian Sleep Med 2025; 20 (1):32-34.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10069-0149

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 15-01-2025

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2025; The Author(s).


Abstract

Nasal expiratory positive airway pressure (EPAP) devices are an emerging treatment option for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), offering a portable, noninvasive alternative to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy. These devices function by generating expiratory resistance, which increases upper airway pressure, preventing collapse, and reducing apneic events. Nasal expiratory positive airway pressure devices, such as Bongo Rx, Provent, and ULTepap have demonstrated efficacy in reducing the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and improving sleep quality, particularly in patients with mild-to-moderate OSA. Studies have shown comparable adherence rates to CPAP, with benefits including simplicity, portability, and the absence of external power requirements. However, limitations include reduced efficacy in severe OSA, patient discomfort due to expiratory resistance, and nasal irritation. This review explores the mechanism of action, clinical evidence, and critical considerations for EPAP devices, highlighting their role as a viable alternative for CPAP-intolerant patients while emphasizing the need for tailored therapy based on individual patient characteristics.


PDF Share
  1. Peppard PE, Young T, Barnet JH, et al. Increased prevalence of sleep-disordered breathing in adults. Am J Epidemiol 2013;177(9):1006–1014. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kws342.
  2. Marin JM, Carrizo SJ, Vicente E, et al. Long-term cardiovascular outcomes in men with obstructive sleep apnoea-hypopnoea with or without treatment with continuous positive airway pressure: An observational study. Lancet 2005;365(9464):1046–1053. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)71141-7.
  3. Weaver TE, Grunstein RR. Adherence to continuous positive airway pressure therapy: The challenge to effective treatment. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2008;5(2):173–178. DOI: 10.1513/pats.200708- 119MG.
  4. Berry RB, Kryger MH, Massie CA. A randomized controlled trial of nasal EPAP for obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Resp Crit Care Med 2011;183(3):343–350. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.200906-0970OC.
  5. Javaheri S, Barbe F. Novel nasal devices for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep Med Clin 2018;13(3):363–375. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsmc.2018.03.003.
  6. Colrain IM, Brooks S, Colrain CA. Bongo Rx for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep Breath 2018;22(3):521–530. DOI: 10.1007/s11325-018-1675-3.
  7. Berry RB, Kryger MH, Massie CA. Provent nasal EPAP therapy for obstructive sleep apnea. Chest. 2011;140(4):114–121. DOI: 10.1378/chest.11-0144.
  8. Berry RB, Kryger MH, Massie CA. A randomized controlled trial of nasal EPAP for obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;183(3):343–350. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.200906-0970OC.
  9. Guralnick AS, Wexler M, Wainford RD. EPAP therapy compared to CPAP in OSA: A clinical perspective. J Clin Sleep Med 2017;13(4): 547–552. DOI: 10.5664/jcsm.6542.
  10. Riaz S, Kumar M, Thomas DC. Long-term outcomes with EPAP devices: An analysis of patient adherence and efficacy. J Sleep Res 2022;31(5):e13568. DOI: 10.1111/jsr.13568.
  11. Chi L, Quan SF. Bench testing of EPAP devices: Understanding efficacy variations. J Sleep Disord 2019;12(1):55–60. DOI: 10.1007/s11325-018-1675-3.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.