Indian Journal of Sleep Medicine

Register      Login

VOLUME 2 , ISSUE 2 ( April-June, 2007 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

The Role of Cephalometric Analysis in Obese and Non Obese Urban Indian Adults with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome : A Pilot Study

BNBM Prasad, B Jayan, Atul Kotwal, OP Kharbanda, SK Roy Chowhdury, SH Gupta

Citation Information : Prasad B, Jayan B, Kotwal A, Kharbanda O, Chowhdury SR, Gupta S. The Role of Cephalometric Analysis in Obese and Non Obese Urban Indian Adults with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome : A Pilot Study. Indian Sleep Med 2007; 2 (2):59-63.

DOI: 10.5005/ijsm-2-2-59

License: CC BY-SA 4.0

Published Online: 01-04-2007

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2007; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Cephalometric data of 28 Urban Indian Obese (Group I) and 15 urban Indian non obese (Group II) Polysomnography (PSG) diagnosed Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) adult cases based on linear and angular measurements were compiled and compared with 20 age-sex matched controls (Group III).Co –relation of cephalometric variables with apnea Hypopnea index (AHI) was also evaluated and suitable statistical tests applied. In Group I, Cephalometric measurements; PAS (posterior airway space), PNS-P (Length of soft palate), MPH (Hyoid distance) were found to be highly significant (p<0.01) and G (Width of soft palate) was found to be significant (p<0.05). In Group II, Cephalometric measurements; PAS, PNS-P and G were found to be highly significant (p<0.01)), while SNB (relationship of mandible to cranial base), MPH, were found to be statistically significant (p<0.05). Positive correlation (p< 0.05, r2 = 0.163) was observed between MPH and AHI. No significant correlation was observed in other cephalometric variables with AHI in Group I and Group II. We concluded that predictable cephalometric measurements in OSA patients combined with PSG findings can be employed effectively for diagnosis and treatment planning in our settings.


PDF Share
  1. Bacon WH, Turlot JC, Krieger J, et al. Cephalometric evaluation of pharyngeal obstructive factors in patients with sleep apnea syndrome. Angle Orthod. 1990; 60:115.
  2. Borowiecki DB, Kukwa A, Blanks RH. Cephalometric analysis for diagnosis of treatment of obstructive sleep apnea. Laryngoscope. 1998; 98:226.
  3. Guilleminault C, Riley R, Powell N. Obstructive sleep apnea and abnormal cephalometric measurements: implications for treatment. Chest. 1984; 86: 793.
  4. Lowe AA, Fleetham JA, Adachi S, et al. Cephalometric and computed tomographic predictors of obstructive sleep apnea severity. Am J orthod dentofac orthop. 1995; 107: 589.
  5. Fernandez DN, Muradas MF. Snoring and obstructive sleep apnea, upper airway evaluation: e medicine. 2005; —— —: 1-14.
  6. Miles PG, Vig PS, Weyant RJ, et al. Craniofacial structures and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome-a qualitive analysis and meta- analysis of the literature. Am J orthod Dentofacial orthop.1996; 109: 163.
  7. Cooke MS, Wei SH. The reproducibility of natural head posture: a methodological study. Am J orthod Dentofacial orthop.1988; 93: 1280-288.
  8. Tao M, Utley DS, Terris DJ. Cephalometric parameters after multilevel pharyngeal surgery for patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Laryngoscope.1998; 108: 789 – 795.
  9. Forza ES, Bacon W, Weiss T, et al. Upper airway collapsibility and cephalometric variables in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Am. J. Respir. Crit Care Med. 2000; 161: 347- 352.
  10. Ferguson KA, Lowe LL, Ryan CF. Effect of mandibular and tongue protrusion on upper airway size during wakefulness. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care med. 1997; 155: 1748-1754
  11. Naganuma H, Okamoto M, Woodson BT, et al. Cephalometric and fiberoptic evaluation case – selection technique for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS). Acta oto laryngol. (Medline). 2002; 57 – 63.
  12. Schwab RJ, Guptka KB, Gefter WB, et al. Upper airway and soft tisse anatomy in normal subjects and patients with sleep disordered breathing. Significance of the lateral pharyngeal wall. Am. J.Respir. Crit. Care Med. 1995; 152: 1673-1689.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.